Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 49(3): 100-105, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28497671

RESUMO

SUMMARY: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with modified, high-dose, major allergen house dust mite extract is widely supported by double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. However, little is known regarding patient-perceived efficacy and satisfaction. An observational, retrospective, multicentre study in patients treated with Acaroid® was conducted to assess the efficacy and degree of satisfaction of the patients after the first six months of treatment with it. All the clinical study procedures were performed according to the routine clinical practice. This study demonstrates that Acaroid® is effective and well tolerated. The patients' condition demonstrated a clear and marked improvement in the first 6 months after treatment initiation. Patients treated with Acaroid® were very satisfied, with a correlation to improvement in patient-perceived symptoms and the administration of treatment by a healthcare professional.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Pyroglyphidae/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 38(6): 295-299, nov.-dic. 2010. ilus, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-83247

RESUMO

From the paediatric point of view, we have undertaken two Delphi studies into bronchial asthma. The first is related to the consensus known as the consensus document of the five associations. The second is more recent and has been undertaken with GEMA (the Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Asthma).The aim of this paper is to carry out a descriptive study comparing the 2 Delphi processes and to objectively assess if in some way behaviour over the past two years has changed as far as expert opinion is concerned.In the consensus document those points giving rise to most controversy were the treatment of children under three years of age and treatment with immunotherapy in allergic asthma. It is also necessary to highlight how important it was at that particular point in time to define the phenotypes of wheezing and the predictive index of asthma in children of less than 3 years of age. Of the 52 questions in the questionnaire, in 13.6% the panel of experts reached no consensus in their positions.Following GEMA the Delphi methodology, 56 questions were asked in the first round of the questionnaire, and consensus was reached in 87.5%. As regards the paediatric part relating to diagnosis and treatment in children, agreement was reached on all the questions in the first round. Agreement was reached in 8.92% questions in the second round.Clinical guidelines and consensus documents can modify behaviour towards an illness, both in the diagnosis and treatment


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento
4.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 38(6): 295-9, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20466477

RESUMO

From the paediatric point of view, we have undertaken two Delphi studies into bronchial asthma. The first is related to the consensus known as the consensus document of the five associations. The second is more recent and has been undertaken with GEMA (the Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Asthma). The aim of this paper is to carry out a descriptive study comparing the 2 Delphi processes and to objectively assess if in some way behaviour over the past two years has changed as far as expert opinion is concerned. In the consensus document those points giving rise to most controversy were the treatment of children under three years of age and treatment with immunotherapy in allergic asthma. It is also necessary to highlight how important it was at that particular point in time to define the phenotypes of wheezing and the predictive index of asthma in children of less than 3 years of age. Of the 52 questions in the questionnaire, in 13.6% the panel of experts reached no consensus in their positions. Following GEMA the Delphi methodology, 56 questions were asked in the first round of the questionnaire, and consensus was reached in 87.5%. As regards the paediatric part relating to diagnosis and treatment in children, agreement was reached on all the questions in the first round. Agreement was reached in 8.92% questions in the second round. Clinical guidelines and consensus documents can modify behaviour towards an illness, both in the diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Consenso , Imunoterapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Técnica Delfos , Prova Pericial , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Seleção de Pacientes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...